Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7800 vs Intel Arc A350

ATI FirePro V7800 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7800
2.016 TFLOPS
Arc A350 +52%
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
768
72
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
DG2-128
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy