Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Apr 2004
FirePro
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
NV41
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
130 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy