Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 215W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2080 +442%
10.07 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Sep 2018
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1515 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
46
1280
Shading Units
2944
80
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
368
-
RT Cores
46
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
109.4 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
314.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.14 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.07 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
314.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
215W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
TU104
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU104-400A-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy