Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs Intel H3C XG310

ATI FirePro V7900 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
H3C XG310 +28%
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Nov 2020
FirePro
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
DG1
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
Unknown
389 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy