Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
1528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +1304%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
1600
Shading Units
72
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

208W
TDP
43W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GT215
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy