Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2475MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.2GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 +1004%
29.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2024
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1920 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
504.2GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
46
1600
Shading Units
5888
80
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
36 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
455.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.15 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.15 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
455.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
200W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
AD103
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
AD103-175-K1-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy