Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
192 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1855MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (125W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5500 +97%
5.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2020
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1744 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1855 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
1408
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.36 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.45 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.224 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
326.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
125W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 14
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy