Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +193%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Mar 2016
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy