Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Lower TDP (26W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (930MHz vs 680MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM +118%
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Dec 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
512
20
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy