Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs Intel Arc A350

AMD FirePro W4000 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
Arc A350 +142%
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
DG2-128
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy