Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM

AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +838%
1.267 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520 OEM
0.135 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
134.6 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.22 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
29W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GF119
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
GF119 B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy