Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs Intel H3C XG310

AMD FirePro W4000 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
H3C XG310 +87%
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2020
FirePro
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
DG1
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
212 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy