Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R9 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 260 OEM +55%
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Dec 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Bonaire
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Bonaire XT (215-0839039)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy