Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 360 OEM +27%
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tobago
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy