Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 380 OEM +159%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Antigua
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Antigua PRO (215-0877000)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy