Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +554%
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2023
FirePro
Generation
Console GPU(ASUS)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
-

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
518.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Phoenix
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
25.39 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
178 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy