Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 125W)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX +252%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
768
Shading Units
1408
48
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
TU116
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy