Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +85%
1.428 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Nov 2011
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
6
768
Shading Units
480
48
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Turks
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy