Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 69W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +455%
1.428 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Nov 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
768
Shading Units
96
48
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
GT215
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy