Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +3561%
1.428 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
GT218
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
18W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy