Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Boost Clock933MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +134%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Tahiti
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy