Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
17408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada +6276%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Dec 2022
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
768
Shading Units
18176
48
TMUs
568
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
AD102
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy