Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5000 vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD FirePro W5000 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5000 +143%
1.267 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
400
48
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Redwood
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy