Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5000 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

AMD FirePro W5000 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5000 +33%
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Dec 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy