Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5000 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

AMD FirePro W5000 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5000
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290 +282%
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Hawaii
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy