Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

AMD FirePro W5100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W5100 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5100 +111%
1.428 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
240
48
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
GT200B
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
219W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy