Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5170M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

AMD FirePro W5170M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5170M and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1335MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5170M
1.184 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +246%
4.101 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Apr 2019
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
37.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
1184 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
74.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tropo
GPU Name
TU116
Tropo XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy