Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs AMD Radeon E8950

AMD FirePro W6170M vs AMD Radeon E8950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 8GB VRAM Radeon E8950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E8950 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon E8950 +107%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Sep 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
32
896
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
256.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Amethyst
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
E8950
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
5 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
95W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy