Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000 +33%
2.432 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GM206
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy