Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

AMD FirePro W7000 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000 +50%
2.432 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tobago
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy