Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs ATI FireGL V8600

AMD FirePro W8000 vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000 +633%
3.226 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
159W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
R600
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy