CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
VS
AMD FirePro W8100
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 220W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100
+1541%
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100
VS
GeForce GT 340 OEM
Graphics Card
Jun 2014
Release Date
Feb 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
12
40
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
96
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
GT215
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
GT215-301-A3
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Board Design
220W
TDP
69W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
2
AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
3
AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
4
AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
5
AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
6
AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA T1000
7
AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
8
AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
9
AMD FirePro W8100 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP
10
AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon Sky 500
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy