Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
2320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100 +525%
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
448bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
40
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
240
160
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT200B
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

220W
TDP
219W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy