Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +862%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT200B
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy