Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs Intel Xe DG1

AMD FirePro W9000 vs Intel Xe DG1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 4GB VRAM Xe DG1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Intel Xe DG1 's Advantages
Boost Clock1550MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +101%
3.994 TFLOPS
Xe DG1
1.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.00 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.968 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.984 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
496.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
DG1
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
Unknown
352 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy