Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100
5.238 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 +28%
6.737 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Apr 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
727 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
2816
Shading Units
2304
176
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.737 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.737 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GA107
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy