Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs Intel Arc A310

AMD FireStream 9170 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Arc A310 +440%
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy