Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
208 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (105W vs 125W)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170 +47%
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce 9800 GT
0.336 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jul 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
320
Shading Units
112
16
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

105W
TDP
125W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-280-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy