Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1280GB)
Lower TDP (105W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES +110%
1.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Sep 2011
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
320
Shading Units
336
16
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.91 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.62 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1046 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.19 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
160W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GF114
-
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy