Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 105W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jul 2005
FireStream
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
-
16
TMUs
12
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
NV41
-
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
TeraScale
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

105W
TDP
83W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy