Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X +144%
1.216 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Feb 2014
FireStream
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy