AMD FireStream 9350 vs ATI FirePro V8800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 208W)
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
+30%
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
1600
72
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
208W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Cypress
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
