Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
1200 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 236W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (141.7GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +224%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1440
Shading Units
240
72
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
236W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GT200
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy