Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI FirePro V3800

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 43W)
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800 +1233%
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
16
Shading Units
400
8
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Redwood
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy