Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +18174%
7.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1545 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
16
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.127 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.127 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
111.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GA107
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
GA107-140-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy