Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +29944%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 300
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
18
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD107
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy