Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 130W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1499MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5700 XT +16955%
7.675 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Aug 2020
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1243 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1499 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
95.94 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
239.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.35 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.675 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
479.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Navi 10
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XTA
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy