NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel GMA X4500
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM GMA X4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Intel GMA X4500 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (13W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
+7%
0.091 TFLOPS
GMA X4500
0.085 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 300M
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
80
16
TMUs
10
8
ROPs
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
533.0 MPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.330 GTexel/s
-
-
-
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
85.28 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
23W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Eaglelake
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 5.0
-
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
