NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel Arc 140V
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Intel Arc 140V to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140V 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
976 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Intel Arc 140V
+4405%
4.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2024
GeForce 300M
Generation
Battlemage
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
MHz
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
16GB
System Shared
Memory Type
LPDDR5x
System Shared
Memory Bus
64bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
0
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.6 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
TFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.1 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 2.1
1x eDp 1.5
-
Power Connectors
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
MCP89
GPU Variant
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Xe2
-
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
3 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12.2
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
