Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 605 OEM and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.35GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 605 OEM
0.1 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +11900%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2012
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 600
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
897 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.35GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
22
48
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
AD107
GF119-200-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy